Upcycling spent grains for food production: Success factors, barriers, applications, and innovation

  1. Food Upcycling
  2. News

Introduction

The brewing industry generates millions of tons of spent grain annually as a byproduct. Upcycling these spent grains aligns with global sustainability goals and presents significant opportunities for food production. This report examines the requirements for ensuring consistent, high-quality spent grain products, explores current barriers, reviews applications and benefits for food producers, and previews future innovation directions. Insights are drawn from practical experiences shared by Upgrain and Foodpeople during an international webinar on October 30, 2025.

1. Requirements for delivering continuous high-quality spent grain products 

Delivering high-quality spent grain ingredients suitable for food production involves a combination of technical, operational, and organizational factors. Experiences from both Upgrain and Foodpeople highlight several core requirements:

1.1. Immediate stabilization and processing

A critical technical requirement is the rapid stabilization of raw spent grain. Spent grain, as it emerges from breweries, typically contains high water content (about 80%) and is warm (~70°C), creating conditions ideal for microbial growth and rapid spoilage. 

Upgrain example: 

Upgrain has addressed this by installing their upcycling facilities directly at the local brewery. As William Beiskjaer of Upgrain explained, “Right after the spent grain bunker…[grain] is shot into our machinery and offcycled within minutes. And of course, then stabilised and put in silos.” This approach ensures minimal spoilage and consistent ingredient quality. 

1.2. Use of clean label processes

Another requirement is to process spent grains with minimal additives to maintain a “clean label” standard. Mechanical processing methods, such as drying and milling, are preferable over enzymatic or chemical treatments, which may trigger regulatory (novel food) barriers and consumer doubts.

Upgrain example:

Upgrain uses exclusively mechanical fractionation techniques to separate proteins and fibers, ensuring the ingredients are “purely barley malt… no GMOs and no additives” meeting food industry demand for clean label ingredients and easing market entry.

1.3. Supply chain consistency and scalability

Food producers require reliable, standardized ingredient deliveries to maintain product quality at industrial scales. This means not only steady supply from partner breweries, but the ability to process and store spent grains in stable forms (typically dried and milled).

Foodpeople example: 

Emma Louise Cox from Foodpeople highlighted logistical challenges: “Sometimes we’ve also been in the position where we've received a side stream that often would have to pause everything in our production because the risk of the side stream will expire is quite big.” For Foodpeople’s best-selling potato buttermilk bun, they established direct supply logistics with the dairy to assure freshness and regularity, demonstrating the need for robust supply partnerships. 

1.4. Ingredient characterization and recipe development

Spent grain ingredients must be well characterized to allow food technologists to adapt recipes and expectations. Know-how is required on hydration, shelf life, flavor contributions, and functional properties. 

Foodpeople example: 

Dry spent grain is favoured for its predictable behavior in formulations: “It gives us the advantage that we know how it will react when mixed with water, sourdough, flour, etc., and therefore gives us consistency.”

2. Barriers to successfully exploiting spent grains

Despite the opportunities, significant challenges must be overcome to integrate spent grain ingredients widely into food production:

2.1. Technical barriers

  • Stabilization logistics: Rapid spoilage of fresh spent grain requires on-site processing or reliable freezing/storage infrastructure, which many breweries or end users lack.
  • Variability: The composition of spent grains can vary based on brewing practices and raw material sources, making standardization challenging for food producers.
  • Limited usage percentages: High fiber content and distinctive flavors limit the substitution levels in many foods before sensory or textural defects arise.

Foodpeople example: 

Emma Louise Cox cited flavor and texture as limiting factors: “For us at least, if the dried spent grain has been used too much or is sort of overdosed, it does impact the flavour and the final feel of the bread… we only use around 1.3% of dried spent grain to our IPA beer bun.”

2.2. Economic barriers

  • Scale and investment: The cost and scale required for stabilization equipment (dryers, mills) may not be feasible for small breweries. While larger breweries or centralized processing can achieve efficiencies, geographical proximity and logistics costs are significant.
  • Market pricing: Upcycled ingredients often start off pricier than established commodities (e.g., wheat flour), due to smaller scale and investment recoupment.

Upgrain example:

Upgrain noted that “in Switzerland is that we are beating the wheat flour prices because we're producing here... as soon as we have to ship it overseas, then transport cost is just too high.” He underlined the need for decentralized, regional processing to keep prices competitive. 

2.3. Market and perception barriers

  • Awareness and acceptance: Both food manufacturers and end consumers may have preconceptions about “waste-based” or “upcycled” ingredients, potentially viewing them as inferior or associated with ultra-processed foods. 
  • Regulatory complexity: Some processing methods may cross thresholds for being “novel foods” under EU or local regulations, complicating adoption. 

Foodpeople example:

Cox emphasized the communications challenge: “Words like surplus and leftovers are perceived sort of often negatively if not framed correctly,” making market education necessary. 

2.4. Application suitability

  • Not all food applications are equally suitable: Breads, snacks, and cereals can integrate spent grains; but the proportion is limited, and specialized technical development is often necessary.

3. Applications and benefits of spent grain products

3.1. Bakery and cereal products

Bakery: Spent grain ingredients add protein and fiber, improve water retention, and can contribute distinctive “nutty, caramel, umami” flavor notes. This can extend shelf life and allow for cleaner labels.

  • Upgrain: Powdered spent grain ingredients (“Upgrain Protein,” “Upgrain Classic”) replace part of the wheat flour in breads and other baked items.
  • Foodpeople: The IPA beer bun uses ~1.3% dried spent grain, offering enhanced nutrition and flavor. The company also used spent grain in festival burger buns, combining with cheese surplus and carrot pulp.

Cereal and snacks: High-protein cereals and chips have been launched or planned using spent grain powder. Upgrain recently developed a high-protein cereal in partnership with a major Swiss retailer.

3.2. Meat and dairy alternatives

Spent grain fractions can be used in high percentages (10%–40%) in meat alternative products, where high fiber and protein are desirable, and textural properties can be managed.

3.3. Non-food applications

While food remains the main target, there is exploratory interest in spent grains for biodegradable cutlery and furniture—although wheat bran remains a cheaper competitor. 

3.4. Value propositions for food producers

  • Nutritional enhancement: Higher protein and fiber content than wheat flour; supports nutrition claims.
  • Sustainability: Upcycling spent grains converts a byproduct into value, reducing waste and environmental impact.
    • Upgrain’s life cycle assessment found 62–90% less greenhouse gas footprint compared to traditional flours and protein sources.
  • Shelf-life improvement: Enhanced water binding extends bread freshness.
  • Cost-effectiveness (in some cases): Fresh spent grain powder can sometimes substitute more expensive flours, and increased water addition means more product yield per kilo of flour.
  • Challenges: Careful formulation needed to avoid adverse impacts on taste or mouthfeel. Practical replacement levels are usually limited in sensitive products (like light-textured breads).

4. Future innovation directions

Innovation in spent grain valorization is active and multifaceted. Both technical and business model innovations will push the field forward:

4.1. Decentralized upcycling networks

Upgrain’s vision is for a decentralized network of processing plants installed at breweries of differing scales, keeping product local, reducing transportation, and driving cost parity with major agricultural commodities.

4.2. Integration with brewery energy

Upgrain is piloting “burn scenario” approaches, where less food-suitable spent grain fractions are used as fuel for direct, on-site green thermal energy generation, helping breweries meet their decarbonization goals.

4.3. Application expansion

Technological and culinary innovations will expand the use-cases and dosage levels for spent grain ingredients:

  • Flavor and functional profiling: New processes to enhance or manage flavors and textures, maximizing use-levels without adverse sensory impact.
  • Plant-based and hybrid foods: Development of hybrid products (e.g., dairy alternatives), as well as high-protein snacks and meat analogs.
  • New product categories: Exploring uses in pasta, sauces, sweet baked goods, and potentially confectionery (as a partial cocoa replacer).

4.4. Improved handling and ingredient consistency

Continued improvements in logistics (e.g., flash-freezing at source, improved drying methods) to accommodate consistency needs of large bakeries and other food manufacturers.

4.5. Enhanced consumer communication

Strategic communication and co-branding efforts (e.g., at festivals or with premium eco-conscious brands) to reposition upcycled ingredients as aspirational and valuable, dispelling “waste” connotations.

4.6. Regulatory and certification initiatives

Seeking clear standards, life cycle assessments, certifications (organic, halal, kosher, FSSC), and perhaps novel food clearances as necessary to grow new markets.

Conclusion

Upcycling spent grains is a promising step toward a circular and sustainable food system. Success requires technical capacity for stabilization, strategic logistical partnerships, and consistent innovation in both products and business models. As examples from Upgrain and Foodpeople illustrate, the journey involves both barriers and opportunities—but ongoing investment, awareness-building, and collaborative innovation are creating a pathway for spent grains to become a staple sustainable ingredient for tomorrow’s food industry.

References

  • Webinar: Upcycling of spent grains from breweries, October 30, 2025.
  • Presentations and panel contributions by William Beiskjaer (Upgrain) and Emma Louise Cox (Foodpeople).